|
DET/MIN
Mar 24, 2008 16:32:34 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Mar 24, 2008 16:32:34 GMT -5
Det Trades: 85-Jason Richardson-$11,111,111--12,222,222--13,333,333--14,444,445 73-Smush Parker-$-2,700,000--3,000,000--3,000,000--3,000,000
Det Gets: 87-Caron Butler-$8,218,990--$8,999,980--$9,780,970--$10,561,960
Incoming:$8,218,990 Outgoing:$13,811,111
Min Gets: 85-Jason Richardson-$11,111,111--12,222,222--13,333,333--14,444,445 73-Smush Parker-$-2,700,000--3,000,000--3,000,000--3,000,000
Min Sends: 87-Caron Butler-$8,218,990--$8,999,980--$9,780,970--$10,561,960
Outgoing:$8,218,990 Incoming:$13,811,111
Ill pick up $2,269,478 of J-Rich salary for the first year to make salaries work
I accept I lose a great player in J-Rich and a good bench player Smush but Butler should be an upgrade imo
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 24, 2008 16:36:30 GMT -5
Post by bigchipp77 - MIN on Mar 24, 2008 16:36:30 GMT -5
i like butler's salary a lot but i need a point guard and get a long-term one in smush.... so soon i will probably be able to trdecrawford and his big contrct so i can resign BG
I accept
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 24, 2008 17:48:12 GMT -5
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Mar 24, 2008 17:48:12 GMT -5
Uh, I dunno...if that Ray Allen deal got denied, I don't think the overall value here is any better. Smush's rating is gonna drop significantly I would guess probably like 70 or 69? and could continue to go down? that's not a long-term PG...it's just gonna be a overpaid bench player...
Butler's rating will probably go up also, and JRich will probably stay the same. Throw in Butler signed to a MUCH cheaper contract, and I don't like it at all.
I for one Reject.
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 24, 2008 20:19:41 GMT -5
Post by Orlando Magic on Mar 24, 2008 20:19:41 GMT -5
I thought SEA eliminated this paying off the players contract business...
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 24, 2008 20:24:46 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Mar 24, 2008 20:24:46 GMT -5
i think he said we could use it but it stops after this season
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 24, 2008 20:25:43 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Mar 24, 2008 20:25:43 GMT -5
Updated
NEW - The Transferring money/Paying a portion of a players contract has gotten a bit out of hand and I have to put some sort of stop to it. We will not allow this starting next off-season. Since I have allowed certain teams to be involved in these types of transactions already, I will allow teams that have not been involved in any of these types of deal to make 1 deal like this. Teams that have already made 1 deal like this, may not anymore.
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 24, 2008 20:26:17 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Mar 24, 2008 20:26:17 GMT -5
so I guess we will have to re-work this out unless it works under the 125% rule which im not good with, do you know if it does orl?
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 24, 2008 20:29:15 GMT -5
Post by Orlando Magic on Mar 24, 2008 20:29:15 GMT -5
Well regardless, I don't like this trade for MIN again. I think he underestimates the quality of the players he is trading. Butler is a very good sim player while j-rich is vastly overrated in this game. On the same grounds as the last one where their sim performances exceed their NBA performances or in this case J-Rich's NBA performance exceeds his production in the game. I think that if MIN's final goal is to resign BG...then trading away a high rated player with relatively low salary is not the way to go. I also disregard Smush here, because I value his performance as LAC does. He is not a worthy starting PG and MIN could find a much better F/PG combo in exchange for butler if he truly wants to deal him away.
I reject, sorry DET/MIN
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 24, 2008 20:31:18 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Mar 24, 2008 20:31:18 GMT -5
what would we have to add to make this deal acceptable in your opinion?
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 24, 2008 20:56:31 GMT -5
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Mar 24, 2008 20:56:31 GMT -5
Detroit you cant be involved in a deal that has money transferring included.
Re-work it where the salaries match up
|
|