|
CLE/MIN
Mar 20, 2008 16:15:07 GMT -5
Post by Cleveland Cavaliers on Mar 20, 2008 16:15:07 GMT -5
im saying you guys should give some leeway on deals, thats all. Look, i know that im probably getting the better end of this deal. But its not that bad. The deal isnt ridicioulosly unfair, which is why we have a trade committe. How are we supposed to control our teams and have the ulmtimate sim league experience if both gm's want to do the deal, its not horribly unfair, and the trade commitee rejects the deal?
|
|
|
CLE/MIN
Mar 20, 2008 16:28:17 GMT -5
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Mar 20, 2008 16:28:17 GMT -5
im saying you guys should give some leeway on deals, thats all. Look, i know that im probably getting the better end of this deal. But its not that bad. The deal isnt ridicioulosly unfair, which is why we have a trade committe. How are we supposed to control our teams and have the ulmtimate sim league experience if both gm's want to do the deal, its not horribly unfair, and the trade commitee rejects the deal? We have a committee so that new gms, thats what minny is, dont get taken advantage of. Sometimes they dont really know who does well and what all the salary situations look like and age situations and all the intangibles. It may seem like a trade that can be passed to some of you, and i respect everyones opinions, but to me it doesn't. I cant allow a team ruin a franchise (no offense to the new Minny gm). I know the committee isnt supposed to look at roster situations, but I have to because i am the admin. This trade puts Minny at 4 SG's and no Centers. I simply cant allow that. If Minny was making a playoff run, Id allow the team to get older (acquiring ray allen), but since Minny isn't going anywhere this year, this trade can be franchise crippling. Just my thoughts. We have heard enough on this topic. I don't really want everyone bickering back and forth. I am going to lock this thread. Re-work the deal guys.
|
|