|
DET/MIN
Mar 16, 2008 20:40:19 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Mar 16, 2008 20:40:19 GMT -5
Det Sends: 73-Smush Parker-$2,700,000--3,000,000--3,000,000--3,000,000 66-Morris Almond-$987,000--1,061,000--1,135,100--1,808,214 64-D.J. Strawberry-$500,000--600,000--700,000
Det Recieves: 75-Randy Foye--$2,631,840--2,815,560--$3,575,761 69-R. McCants--$1,769,160--2,620,126--$2,620,126
Outgoing:4,187,000 Incoming:4,401,000
Min Recieves: 73-Smush Parker-$2,700,000--3,000,000--3,000,000--3,000,000 66-Morris Almond-$987,000--1,061,000--1,135,100--1,808,214 64-D.J. Strawberry-$500,000--600,000--700,000
Min Sends: 75-Randy Foye--$2,631,840--2,815,560--$3,575,761 69-R. McCants--$1,769,160--2,620,126--$2,620,126
Incoming:4,187,000 Outgoing:4,401,000
I accept i get a good back-up pg
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 16, 2008 20:43:34 GMT -5
Post by bigchipp77 - MIN on Mar 16, 2008 20:43:34 GMT -5
Det Sends: 73-Smush Parker-$2,700,000--3,000,000--3,000,000--3,000,000 66-Morris Almond-$987,000--1,061,000-- 1,135,100-- 1,808,21464-D.J. Strawberry-$500,000--600,000-- 700,000Det Recieves: 75-Randy Foye--$2,631,840-- 2,815,560-- $3,575,761 69-R. McCants--$1,769,160--2,620,126-- $2,620,126Outgoing:4,187,000 Incoming:4,401,000 Min Recieves: 73-Smush Parker-$2,700,000--3,000,000--3,000,000--3,000,000 66-Morris Almond-$987,000--1,061,000-- 1,135,100-- 1,808,21464-D.J. Strawberry-$500,000--600,000-- 700,000Min Sends: 75-Randy Foye--$2,631,840-- 2,815,560-- $3,575,761 69-R. McCants--$1,769,160--2,620,126-- $2,620,126Incoming:4,187,000 Outgoing:4,401,000 I accept i get a good back-up pg i accept i like smush's long steady contract and i'm getting some good young talent
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 16, 2008 21:06:25 GMT -5
Post by Utah Jazz on Mar 16, 2008 21:06:25 GMT -5
Um, no. I reject. Foye's contract is better, and he's better. McCants >>> Almond and Strawberry. Almond needs to score 60+ points in a real NBA game to make this fair.
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 16, 2008 21:09:02 GMT -5
Post by Chicago Bulls on Mar 16, 2008 21:09:02 GMT -5
I'm going to agree with Utah on this, I reject.
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 16, 2008 21:11:19 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Mar 16, 2008 21:11:19 GMT -5
if we just take mccants out would u accept?
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 16, 2008 21:22:13 GMT -5
Post by Utah Jazz on Mar 16, 2008 21:22:13 GMT -5
I don't know about other GM's, but I still wouldn't. Parker's on his way down, and the other 2 guys are still long-shots at making it in the big leagues. Foye will be a lot higher up when it's all said and done.
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 16, 2008 23:07:14 GMT -5
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Mar 16, 2008 23:07:14 GMT -5
I reject. This is a no brainer.
Also, Smush is a 72 not 73. On his way down to a 69ish
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 17, 2008 2:47:31 GMT -5
Post by sharmoot - POR on Mar 17, 2008 2:47:31 GMT -5
yeh if i were voting id say this is not a good trade
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 17, 2008 6:38:49 GMT -5
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Mar 17, 2008 6:38:49 GMT -5
I reject as well. I dunno why anyone would even trade Foye for all three of those guys. Foye will work his way up the rating points...those other 3 are really not that exciting at all. Smush's contract is only one year longer than Foye, and Foye is cheaper.
makes no sense at all really.
Reject
|
|
|
DET/MIN
Mar 17, 2008 8:50:10 GMT -5
Post by New Orleans Hornets on Mar 17, 2008 8:50:10 GMT -5
i reject this also
not a good trade
|
|