|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Nov 26, 2007 22:06:28 GMT -5
Lakers trade:
Smush Parker (74) $3,000,000
Lakers recieve:
29th pick in draft
Total incoming salary: $0 Total outgoing salary: $3,000,000
LAL Salary before trade:$50,424,685 LAL Salary after trade: 47,424,685
Bobcats trade:
29th pick in draft
Bobcats recieve:
Smush Parker (74) $3,000,000
Total incoming salary: $3,000,000 Total outgoing salary: $0
Bobcats salary before trade: $52,775,184 Bobcats salary after trade: $55,775,184
I accept.
NOTE: this is pending LAL/MEM and CHA/HOU
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Nov 26, 2007 22:18:28 GMT -5
I can't vote obviously until those other deals go through and also until Bobcats accept that trade, but I don't see any way that deal will go through. a 74 for at best a 64 or 63? we will see...
|
|
|
Post by frankg90 - CHA on Nov 26, 2007 22:31:10 GMT -5
yea but he doesnt want the smush and his salary, and there is a player that he wants in the draft its a sign and trade
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Nov 27, 2007 0:15:24 GMT -5
i reject
3,000,000 for a player rated 74 is not that bad. Lakers will be getting a player rated in the low 60's and he will have to pay him 1 million at least.
I simply do not understand this trade
|
|
|
Post by frankg90 - CHA on Nov 27, 2007 0:17:46 GMT -5
yea but he doesnt want smush at all
|
|
|
Post by wilberto628 - MIL on Nov 27, 2007 0:20:27 GMT -5
i reject, if he doesnt want smush, i will give him something more than a 64 rated player.....please
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bulls on Nov 27, 2007 3:58:55 GMT -5
Reject
|
|
|
Post by Orlando Magic on Nov 27, 2007 6:32:12 GMT -5
i reject
|
|
|
Post by raps03 - TOR on Nov 27, 2007 7:23:43 GMT -5
reject
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Nov 27, 2007 11:27:42 GMT -5
Smush is way overrated then you think, he put up nice numbers with the Lakers ONLY BECAUSE HE WAS PLAYING WITH KOBE, but the way he is playing with the Heat, look at his stats playing with Shaq, Wade, and Ricky Davis.
no results.
I actually have planned to get a young player in mind I had.
Smush has good value, but look closer at his stats and you will see otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Nov 27, 2007 11:30:13 GMT -5
as for the Evans trade, I hope that goes through, Evans is a solid role player but nothing more, on the other hand the prospects can become better and better.
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Nov 27, 2007 11:32:59 GMT -5
these are his numbers as a Heat right now www.nba.com/playerfile/smush_parker/index.html?nav=pagelook at his overall career stats www.nba.com/playerfile/smush_parker/career_stats.htmlthe only reason why Smush even has a good rating is because the rating SEA gave was an updated Live 07 rating, and also Smush played right along side Kobe and got 40 minutes a game. look at him right now he has Wade and Shaq, and he should be better with them instead, they are worse with him. he is a good player but not a player that will impact a team big time, like the prospect I had in mind.
|
|
|
Post by New Orleans Hornets on Nov 27, 2007 15:06:19 GMT -5
i reject
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Nov 27, 2007 15:45:40 GMT -5
I cant do anything about what rating he was given. We have to go by that, since that is what he is rated currently.
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Nov 27, 2007 15:48:06 GMT -5
but seriously though even if those are the ratings they will change immidiately.
heck I got a similar deal for this for Mo Evans who is rated a 71.
and he is a scurb just like Smush.
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Nov 27, 2007 15:56:00 GMT -5
but seriously though even if those are the ratings they will change immidiately. heck I got a similar deal for this for Mo Evans who is rated a 71. and he is a scurb just like Smush. Just because they are struggling this year in real life doesn't mean they will struggle in a sim. Smush can start in a sim league and put up decent numbers. Hes not a scrub. He is a legit 6th or 7th best player on a team.
|
|