|
DET/SAC
Nov 25, 2007 19:27:51 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Nov 25, 2007 19:27:51 GMT -5
Det Trades: Richard Hamilton(82)10,000,000-10,812,500-11,625,000 Robert Horry(72)-$3,630,000 Det 1st rd(28th) Det 08 1st rd
Det Recieves: Jason-Richardson(85)-$11,111,111--$12,222,222--$13,333,333----$14,444,445 Sac 2nd Rd(49th)
INCOMING SALARY:$11,111,111 OUTGOING SALARY:$13,630,000
Sac Trades: Jason-Richardson(85)-$11,111,111--$12,222,222--$13,333,333----$14,444,445 Sac 2nd Rd(49th)
Sac Recieves: Richard Hamilton(82)10,000,000-10,812,500-11,625,000 Robert Horry(72)-$3,630,000 Det 1st rd(28th) Det 08 1st rd
INCOMING SALARY:$13,630,000 OUTGOING SALARY:$11,111,111
I accept I get a great SG and i get rid of about 2 mil in salary I give up picks but my team is good so i dont think theyll be anything good
I think this works under the 125% rule
|
|
|
DET/SAC
Nov 25, 2007 19:30:15 GMT -5
Post by hogsrule44 on Nov 25, 2007 19:30:15 GMT -5
I accept
|
|
|
DET/SAC
Nov 25, 2007 19:34:04 GMT -5
Post by raps03 - TOR on Nov 25, 2007 19:34:04 GMT -5
i accept
|
|
|
DET/SAC
Nov 25, 2007 20:10:03 GMT -5
Post by hardballer1 - NYK on Nov 25, 2007 20:10:03 GMT -5
i know my vote don't count but thats a good trade for both teams. DET getting a great player in J-Rid and SAC getting one of the better shooting guards and maybe the best clutch shooter in the NBA right now at least in the Finals.
good trade
|
|
|
DET/SAC
Nov 25, 2007 20:55:48 GMT -5
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Nov 25, 2007 20:55:48 GMT -5
I kinda think one of the 1st rounders should be taken out of the deal...Horry for the 2nd is even I think (no rating given for Horry so technically the deal isn't posted correctly.) Also, are any of those years team options for either player? long contracts generally have some options in them, but I'm not positive with these two. getting back to my point, if Horry for mid/late 2nd is even, and I think horry is actually better just older, then JRich for Rip and two 1sts seems a little much for me. I'm gonna use the lack of a rating as an excuse to not vote either way yet, cuz I'd like to see that.
|
|
|
DET/SAC
Nov 26, 2007 4:15:15 GMT -5
Post by Washington Wizards on Nov 26, 2007 4:15:15 GMT -5
i agree with LAC 1 1st rounder should be removed
|
|
|
DET/SAC
Nov 26, 2007 14:07:31 GMT -5
Post by Orlando Magic on Nov 26, 2007 14:07:31 GMT -5
i decline this. you are getting WAY too much for j-rich. two 1st rounders are too much. id even think about accepting j-rich for just rip and horry.
|
|
|
DET/SAC
Nov 26, 2007 14:14:07 GMT -5
Post by hardballer1 - NYK on Nov 26, 2007 14:14:07 GMT -5
wow i didn't realize there were 2 1st rund picks in that trade DET needs to take one of those picks out at least one if not both.
|
|
|
DET/SAC
Nov 26, 2007 17:41:18 GMT -5
Post by frankg90 - CHA on Nov 26, 2007 17:41:18 GMT -5
yea i decline, 2 first rounders and rip for jrich is way too much
|
|
|
DET/SAC
Nov 26, 2007 17:57:45 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Nov 26, 2007 17:57:45 GMT -5
Rip is declining he is being figured out by most teams and has lost some of his swagger now dont get me wrong i love the guy but i feel j-rich has the potential to shine in cha Seriously my 2 picks are worth squat maybe get a 60-63 with my pick this year and around same next plus i clear cap space which i need!
|
|
|
DET/SAC
Nov 26, 2007 18:34:27 GMT -5
Post by Chicago Bulls on Nov 26, 2007 18:34:27 GMT -5
Richard Hamilton is better then Jason Richardson, even if he is declining. So adding in Robert Horry and 2 first round picks is worth way more then J-Rich and a second round pick.
(Edited: I'll accept when both first round picks are removed.)
|
|
|
DET/SAC
Nov 26, 2007 19:03:36 GMT -5
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Nov 26, 2007 19:03:36 GMT -5
i have to reject this as well. remove 1 of the 1st rounders and it is acceptable
|
|
|
DET/SAC
Nov 26, 2007 20:14:07 GMT -5
Post by Memphis Grizzlies on Nov 26, 2007 20:14:07 GMT -5
I reject
|
|