|
Post by Cleveland Cavaliers on Feb 7, 2010 0:40:39 GMT -5
Cleveland Trades:
Lorenzen Wright (67) $750,000
Cleveland Receives:
Jermareo Davidson (64) $600,000 | $700,000 2011 First Round Pick (Denver)
Total Incoming:$600,000 Total Outgoing:$750,000
Denver Receives:
Lorenzen Wright (67) $750,000
Denver Trades:
Jermareo Davidson (64) $600,000 | $700,000 2011 First Round Pick (Denver)
Total Outgoing:$600,000 Total Incoming:$750,000
I accept.
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Feb 7, 2010 0:46:04 GMT -5
I accept, just looking to boost my bench and since i am lacking pf, wright is the cheapest option. Plus i'm not big on picks.
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Feb 7, 2010 9:55:37 GMT -5
This seems like not a huge deal, but really, I'm thinking about rejecting. A 3 rating point difference does not need a 1st round pick, even if it will likely be a late pick, to make up that 3 point difference.
A 2nd rounder would more than suffice. This just seems grossly out of balance to me.
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Feb 7, 2010 17:38:22 GMT -5
Btw, Wright has PO. So lets wait and see if it gets accepted. I will be making the final list tonight, and the staff can look it over to see if it looks good. The list will be released tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Feb 10, 2010 16:00:38 GMT -5
Well, Wright accepted, but I'm not.
That 1st rounder is WAY too much value to give up for 3 rating point difference.
Reject from me.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Feb 10, 2010 19:38:05 GMT -5
Just curious, do you have any 2nd rounders Denver.
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Feb 10, 2010 19:41:12 GMT -5
have one but that locked up for another trade (another blockbuster lol)
|
|
|
Post by Cleveland Cavaliers on Feb 10, 2010 20:30:31 GMT -5
Once again Boston you need to stop looking at what could make the trade better in your eyes and just let people trade. Who cares if he has a second rounder? Is there a second rounder in the the deal? No, so just vote on it. Let two veteran GM's that have been in the league a long time and who have managed teams just deal.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Feb 10, 2010 20:32:33 GMT -5
Once again Boston you need to stop looking at what could make the trade better in your eyes and just let people trade. Who cares if he has a second rounder? Is there a second rounder in the the deal? No, so just vote on it. Let two veteran GM's that have been in the league a long time and who have managed teams just deal. Voting on a trade is kind of like the law, it applies to everyone regardless of age, sex, gender, how long you've been in the league, etc. I hate that argument, the rules apply to everyone and all Boston is doing is doing what he feels is right...and I tend to agree with him.
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Feb 10, 2010 20:46:33 GMT -5
lol cavs leave Boston alone, I think he was the right man for the committee job, I was optimistic at first. But he has done one hell of a job, remove my trades out of the picture but Boston is one hell of a committee member. He see trades that are fair irl and is not afraid to voice his opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Feb 10, 2010 20:46:54 GMT -5
Fine, I'll vote
reject
A potential lottery pick for Wright is a bad deal for Denver.
|
|
|
Post by Cleveland Cavaliers on Feb 10, 2010 20:47:22 GMT -5
I always felt the trade committee should function as a security blanket rather than an equality court. You of all people should feel me on that one Charlotte. (Pierce for Butler ring any bells?)
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Feb 10, 2010 20:50:15 GMT -5
Yea for the record, a 2nd rounder instead of the 1st rounder in this deal, and I would accept.
As it is, as I've already said, easy Reject for me.
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Feb 10, 2010 20:51:32 GMT -5
I always felt the trade committee should function as a security blanket rather than an equality court. You of all people should feel me on that one Charlotte. (Pierce for Butler ring any bells?) It would be great if we could just be a security blanket, as you say it...but this trade is just bad. It's really not even close.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Feb 10, 2010 23:08:12 GMT -5
I always felt the trade committee should function as a security blanket rather than an equality court. You of all people should feel me on that one Charlotte. (Pierce for Butler ring any bells?) People were/are WAY too high on Caron Butler, I just wanted him for his contract. I traded him for Gordon and MIN's 2010 1st, right now Gordon is an 84 and Butler an 85... I would say I won that deal. Don't get sassy with me you know this is a bad deal, you've been doing this long enough.
|
|
|
Post by Cleveland Cavaliers on Feb 10, 2010 23:09:56 GMT -5
Haha sassy on me?
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Feb 10, 2010 23:34:09 GMT -5
I think I'll have to reject too. Wright's hardly worth a 1st.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Feb 11, 2010 10:56:49 GMT -5
Yes lol, I was trying to keep the bashing/name calling at a minimal and I figured sassy would just make you laugh!
|
|
|
Post by Cleveland Cavaliers on Feb 11, 2010 21:58:59 GMT -5
Haha if you want to call speaking my mind bashing then so be it, but there was no name calling involved.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Feb 11, 2010 23:55:19 GMT -5
Haha if you want to call speaking my mind bashing then so be it, but there was no name calling involved. No I didn't want to call you something you might find offensive...that's why I said sassy instead of being an idiot or something like that.
|
|