|
|
Post by sharmoot - POR on Dec 10, 2007 5:40:50 GMT -5
Hey guys but a suggestion, should u guys think there should be a penalty imposed to GM's who go way over a certain salary limit
for arguments sake if i have 65 mil and the league average is 65 mil n there are like 2 3 GMs who have 75-80mil salaries should u think they should get some sought of salary tax or penalty imposed on their salaries or anything for the next season? or any sought of penalty.
Its just a suggestion i just want to see what all GM's think around here and maybe we can come to an agreement or just scrap the idea, i not complaining about any GM's, just out of curiosity.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Dec 10, 2007 18:50:07 GMT -5
i have no issue with havin g a luxury tax, I just dont know how we would do it.
|
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Dec 10, 2007 18:55:53 GMT -5
which kind of penalty are you thinking about?
|
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Dec 10, 2007 20:23:53 GMT -5
Loss of draft position? Say your team has the 15th pick, they have 80mil in salary's, they move down a few draft positions? I dunno though..
|
|
|
|
Post by dagr81 - MIN on Dec 10, 2007 20:30:05 GMT -5
I vote no penalties, or if we did it should be something like no trades with more salaries coming in then going out. (no 25% rule)
|
|
|
|
Post by sharmoot - POR on Dec 11, 2007 7:27:50 GMT -5
I vote no penalties, or if we did it should be something like no trades with more salaries coming in then going out. (no 25% rule) thats one good 1 u cannot be $1 over the team ur trading with so if ur total incoming salary for the trade is $22.000.000 and ur total outgoing salary is 19.999.999 then it should be rejected on basis of salary maybe? draft position sounds alright too, but then they can just easily trade away their draft picks too |
|
|
|
Post by Washington Wizards on Dec 11, 2007 8:42:00 GMT -5
I honestly think we shouldn't put additional penalties....
Why?
because it would be double jeopardy to the GM...
If one is over the salary cap, it is very hard to resign a player and it is difficult to fix trades so that it would follow the 25% rule.
That is already like a penalty
Ex: Orlando, just to resign VC he did everything he could and there was a big chance he was not to succed but fortunately he did. Just removing enough salary to resign VC was very hard for the Gm...
And if we add another penalty... it would really suck for them
BTW some teams are already above the limit when u get them...
ex: Denver if there is no changes done to the squad their salary would be about 80m i think....
|
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Dec 11, 2007 9:02:41 GMT -5
I wouldn't mind taking away the 125% rule.
Teams that are over the cap would not be able to have more incoming salary than outgoing salary. Pretty simple & easy. Its not even that big of a penalty.
Not final yet, though
|
|
|
|
Post by sharmoot - POR on Dec 11, 2007 9:41:16 GMT -5
I wouldn't mind taking away the 125% rule. Teams that are over the cap would not be able to have more incoming salary than outgoing salary. Pretty simple & easy. Its not even that big of a penalty. Not final yet, though yeh i like that idea but thebest way to determine what salary u have to have is add all the teams salaries and averageit out and make that the benchmark |
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Dec 11, 2007 9:43:10 GMT -5
what do ya mean? to determine the cap?
i dont want to tinker with the cap at all
|
|
|
|
Post by sharmoot - POR on Dec 11, 2007 9:44:24 GMT -5
how do we determine some1 is over the cap?
|
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Dec 11, 2007 9:45:51 GMT -5
the cap is set at 67,500,000 + a team gets 5 million via MLE
so we could set it at 75 million? kinda like a hard cap?
|
|
|
|
Post by sharmoot - POR on Dec 11, 2007 9:48:23 GMT -5
yeh im sure most teams are around the 67 500 000
we should set an "extreme cap" where once it surpasses that, the trade rule comesi nto play
but how to determine it im not sure
maybe add all the salaries , divide the number by team and then add a certain millions on it n it makes it that max cap before penalties
|
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Dec 11, 2007 9:51:00 GMT -5
I say we set it at 72,500,000. If you are above that, the 125% cannot be used when you trade. If you are under 72,500,000 but over 67,500,000 you may use teh 125% rule. How does that sound?
|
|
|
|
Post by sharmoot - POR on Dec 11, 2007 10:06:41 GMT -5
yeh sounds good to me
we just need the yes or no by all GMs wouldnt we?
or just the majority or just the committee?
|
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Dec 11, 2007 10:09:40 GMT -5
i will start a poll, lets see what everyone thinks.
|
|
|
|
Post by sharmoot - POR on Dec 11, 2007 10:10:25 GMT -5
done
|
|
