|
Post by sniper on Dec 14, 2008 13:56:55 GMT -5
Bobcats Trades: 73| Kyle Korver - $4,781,818 - $5,163,636 70| Chuck Hayes - $4,500,000 - $5,000,000 - $5,500,000 64| Tony Battie - $5,746,000 - $6,292,000 64| Jared Jeffries $6,049,400 - $6,466,600 - $6,838,300 09 1st (Thunder) 2010 2nd (T-wolves) 2010 2nd (Kings)
Bobats Receives: 76| Ben Wallace - $14,500,000 - $14,000,000 66| Brian Cardinal - $6,300,000 - $6,750,000 62| Patrick Ewing Jr. - $500,000 - $500,000
Total Incoming: $21,300,000 Total Outgoing: $21,077,218
Wolves Trades: 76| Ben Wallace - $14,500,000 - $14,000,000 66| Brian Cardinal - $6,300,000 - $6,750,000 62| Patrick Ewing Jr. - $500,000 - $500,000
Wolves Receives: 73| Kyle Korver - $4,781,818 - $5,163,636 70| Chuck Hayes - $4,500,000 - $5,000,000 - $5,500,000 64| Tony Battie - $5,746,000 - $6,292,000 64| Jared Jeffries $6,049,400 - $6,466,600 - $6,838,300 09 1st (Thunder) 2010 2nd (T-wolves) 2010 2nd (Kings)
Total Incoming: $21,077,218 Total Outgoing: $21,300,000
I accept. I finally get rid of Big Ben! ;D I get Korver who is a good player, and has 5 million expiring if he doesn't play his cards right. I get Hayes back who will most likely start at PF. Battie and Jeffries look like bad contracts, but if you know me I have a bunch of expring contracts in 2 years.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Dec 14, 2008 14:15:54 GMT -5
I accept as well, this is obviously a move for the PLAYOFFS!?!?! YOUR TALKING PLAYOFFS, PLAYOFFS!?!?!? I don't feel like the risk is that great, Korver doesn't fit my system and I don't think has a lot of potential. He's nice off the bench, but I had NO kind of center and now I'm going to ride Big Ben until he has nothing left. To be honest I feel like I am only giving up OKC's 1st, because I have SOO many 2010 2nd's I wouldn't be able to keep them all. Getting rid of Hayes is a blessing to me as well, so this seemed like a logical trade.
A starting 5 of Ford/Gordon/Gay/CV31/Big Ben MIGHT get me in the playoffs...and yeah it could hurt my pick but if I get in NY probably won't, so it could work out the same. Boston downgraded imo and that factored into this trade, I think I could be the 8th seed now. Big Ben will probably be about a 72-68ish next year, but he'll be expiring so he'll have value and if nothing else can be my back up center and then $14,000,000 M off the books. Pleasure doing business with the Wolves and good luck to them!
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Dec 14, 2008 15:17:06 GMT -5
CHA your done, you can't trade anymore until next Sunday, you can only make 3 trades per week this rule was made long ago to stop constant madness of trading every second, so this trade has to wait atleast for a week before CM will approve/decline on this.
And NO, no exceptions OKC WON'T let anyone make exceptions.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Dec 14, 2008 15:54:41 GMT -5
CHA your done, you can't trade anymore until next Sunday, you can only make 3 trades per week this rule was made long ago to stop constant madness of trading every second, so this trade has to wait atleast for a week before CM will approve/decline on this. And NO, no exceptions OKC WON'T let anyone make exceptions. I wasn't aware of the rule, I mean I read the rules when I first joined but it said something about "you make a trade with one team 3 times per season." That wasn't really enforced so I didn't know there was a rule, when you made your outburst (like I did something wrong knowing the rule) I did go back and read and it is in the rules. Anyways so what is a "week?" Does it start over every Sunday or is it 7 straight days? If it's Sunday then today it can be put through, if it's 7 straight days then I made my trade with the Knicks on December 7th, meaning December 14th it can go through (which would be today.) Either way you are wrong there LAL, and I don't appreicate you jumping on me like this. I thought we were past the point of name calling? I'd like some clarification from OKC, and I'd also hope in the future that we will be informed of a rule change.
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Dec 14, 2008 16:41:54 GMT -5
You can make three trades in a 7 day period. Since your 1st trade of the week was approved on December 11th, this trade is eligible to go through on the 18th.
It can still be voted on.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Dec 14, 2008 16:50:53 GMT -5
You can make three trades in a 7 day period. Since your 1st trade of the week was approved on December 11th, this trade is eligible to go through on the 18th. It can still be voted on. With all due respect, that's not 100% true. If you look at my first trade (with the Knicks) it was approved on December 8th. It took the Knicks a long time (due to computer issues) to cut Watson. I don't think I should be punished for the Knicks computer issues, and I had the trade in mind well over a week ago.
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Dec 14, 2008 17:00:05 GMT -5
Thats true. Whatev
Trade is eligible
|
|
|
Post by Orlando Magic on Dec 14, 2008 17:05:45 GMT -5
i accept, in my eyes its mostly trash for trash
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Dec 14, 2008 17:12:34 GMT -5
LOL. Minny keeps on collecting SG/SF types. Most of his roster consists of this. No size what so ever and are getting even smaller here with the trade of Wallace.
Anywho, I accept
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Dec 14, 2008 17:12:49 GMT -5
I accept.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Dec 14, 2008 17:30:59 GMT -5
i accept, in my eyes its mostly trash for trash You'll be thinking that when Yao is out of breath from chasing Wallace down the court and we put a knot on yalls head!
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Dec 14, 2008 19:10:19 GMT -5
haha Charlotte. I'm gonna go ahead and accept as well.
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia 76ers on Dec 14, 2008 19:57:30 GMT -5
I'll accept.
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Dec 14, 2008 20:12:00 GMT -5
More accepts then needed
Trade Approved Update Charts ASAP
|
|