|
|
Post by sniper on Nov 15, 2008 19:13:10 GMT -5
Danny Granger (83): $2,329,805
Bobby Simmons (71): $9,920,000 | $10,560,000
Total = $12,249,805
for
81| Chris Kaman - $9,500,000 - $10,400,000 - $11,300,000 - $12,200,000
73| Hakim Warrick - $2,119,102
73| Nate Robinson - $2,020,178
2009 Nuggets 2nd Round Pick
Total = $13,639,280
I accept, our last trade attempt I did was to get two elite player, but I screwed up on my plan for the team. This one goes along with it.
Also, Simmons is another big expiring contract in the 2010 season.
|
|
|
|
Post by hardballer1 - NYK on Nov 15, 2008 19:23:58 GMT -5
i accept
i lose a very talented guard in granger and my 6th man. but i gain needed front court power.
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Nov 15, 2008 19:27:49 GMT -5
I think Minny might be overpaying for Granger, bu I cant blame him, the guys is putting up ridic. stats and rating could go up. I also like it for NYK side because he really needed a big man in Kaman and Warrick can start at PF for him also
so, I accept
|
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Nov 15, 2008 20:19:36 GMT -5
Minny what exactly is your plan? Do you have one? It seems like you are trading just for the sake of trading. Gay for Kaman and now Kaman for Granger. I would like to know the direction you are taking your team.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Nov 15, 2008 20:33:02 GMT -5
Ill accept after I got a good enough explanation via PM.
|
|
|
|
Post by Orlando Magic on Nov 15, 2008 21:06:16 GMT -5
I as well would like to see some sort of reason why u are trading kaman and hak for a guy who will fulfill basically the same role that gay filled when u traded him away...
|
|
|
|
Post by sniper on Nov 15, 2008 21:10:23 GMT -5
I will send a PM your way too I guess....
|
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Nov 15, 2008 21:27:47 GMT -5
I think I might need that PM as well. I don't get what you're doing Minny. Kaman for Granger is alright, but Simmons is a bad contract, and you're giving up an improving Nate Robinson.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Nov 15, 2008 21:29:19 GMT -5
As someone who has a stake in the future of the T-wolves (owner of the 2010 1st) I would also like to see the PM.
|
|
|
|
Post by sniper on Nov 15, 2008 21:37:19 GMT -5
Well, the reason I traded Gay was to to get Kaman and Warrick.
Then I added Warrick into a trade offer for Granger, so that I would have Granger and Kaman.
At the end of it, he wanted Kaman in return. After that I was mad, since I traded away Gay and changed my teams plan. But then I decided to go back to my original plan so now I am doing this.
Now about Simmons, he does have a terrible contract. But go to my salaries and I have Wallace , Miles, Cardinal and now Simmons. All big expiring contracts for the 2010 off season.
$40,310,000 expiring.
|
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Nov 15, 2008 22:18:07 GMT -5
Now I understand Simmons, but I still don't understand why you would deal Kaman, Warrick, AND Robinson for Granger. And then worrying about re-signing Granger.
|
|
|
|
Post by sniper on Nov 15, 2008 22:36:38 GMT -5
Just sent you a PM.
Now that everyone knows the deal, and my mistake...
Can we get on to Accepting or Rejecting?
|
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia 76ers on Nov 15, 2008 23:13:21 GMT -5
I agree with OKC, looks like Minny is trading for the sake of trading but this trade does give him a lot of cap for the 2010 FA market which is gonna be nuts. I'll accept.
|
|
|
|
Post by sniper on Nov 15, 2008 23:15:28 GMT -5
I agree with OKC, looks like Minny is trading for the sake of trading but this trade does give him a lot of cap for the 2010 FA market which is gonna be nuts. I'll accept. No, like a said before I traded Gay so that I could get Kaman and Granger. Two elite players. That did not work out. This will most likely be my last trade for a long time. |
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Nov 15, 2008 23:40:39 GMT -5
Granger is studly. Honestly believe he should be rated in the upper 80s by the next time we change ratings. I like this for Minny a bit honestly...nate should get an increase as well, but Granger has a load of potential and is already realizing it. Simmons with the huge expiring is awesome for him as well.
I'll accept it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Nov 16, 2008 0:31:12 GMT -5
Well......after a couple PM's, and a trip to the gym, I'll accept. I thought about it hard enough to realize that Granger is probably a tidbit better than Gay, which Minny got Kaman/Warrick for. And Nate makes up that difference-ish. Don't worry about the gym part, I'm a complex person.
|
|
|
|
Post by hardballer1 - NYK on Nov 16, 2008 12:47:05 GMT -5
so thats good enough accepts right?
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Nov 16, 2008 12:54:26 GMT -5
yea
Trade Approved
Updated Charts ASAP
|
|
|
|
Post by hardballer1 - NYK on Nov 16, 2008 12:56:55 GMT -5
just finished.
|
|
