|
Post by Houston Rockets on Aug 5, 2008 17:56:21 GMT -5
its pointless because its not going to get changed, but bogut is better than a 79-esp if frye is a 79- i mean give me a break
|
|
|
Post by theanswer - IND on Aug 5, 2008 18:01:22 GMT -5
In my opinion bogut is worth 80 at least he had a great season this season and he should be and 80 i no a league were he is 80 so i think he should be as well just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Aug 5, 2008 18:45:35 GMT -5
its pointless because its not going to get changed, but bogut is better than a 79-esp if frye is a 79- i mean give me a break Frye will most likley go down I think the staff just missed it
|
|
|
Post by New Orleans Hornets on Aug 7, 2008 6:50:46 GMT -5
DEN told me this
what do you guys think?
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Aug 7, 2008 8:03:41 GMT -5
97-98 would be too much for him IMO...he is a sim league beast but I just dont think that he should be rated higher than 95
|
|
|
Post by Houston Rockets on Aug 7, 2008 8:28:53 GMT -5
no absolutley not....
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Aug 7, 2008 11:26:29 GMT -5
DEN told me this what do you guys think? Duncan is good where he is IMO Like NJ said he already has won the MVP twice so he dosent need a boost
|
|
|
Post by Cleveland Cavaliers on Aug 7, 2008 12:56:09 GMT -5
Are you guys nuts? Of course TD should be higher, but you guys are afraid becuase he'd be giving the back to back champions probably a 3rd championship. Tim Duncan is the most underrated player in the NBA, and its a shame because he is a top 5 player. Duncan is a 91. Of course he should be higher. In my opinion he should be a 97. He is equal to if not better than Kevin Garnett, and i'll admit, he is alot more dominant than my own player who is a 91, Elton Brand.
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Aug 7, 2008 13:01:14 GMT -5
He got raised to a 93
|
|
|
Post by supremegm - MIA on Aug 7, 2008 13:06:57 GMT -5
i agree with cleveland... i dont see why duncan would be rated lower than kg
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Aug 7, 2008 13:15:11 GMT -5
i agree with cleveland... i dont see why duncan would be rated lower than kg then i could make the same argument that Howard should be rated as good as TD , because he has put up better stats than Duncan, but im not gonn aocmplain because everyones rating is fair, KG has been a 97 for a long time, and TD has been in the 90-93 range for a while, both r good ratings IMO
|
|
|
Post by supremegm - MIA on Aug 7, 2008 13:18:00 GMT -5
dwight howard shouldnt even be rated as high as amare
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Aug 7, 2008 13:24:26 GMT -5
dwight howard shouldnt even be rated as high as amare he isnt amare is a 92
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Aug 7, 2008 14:10:59 GMT -5
I don't know if it'd be fair then, if TD was raised and started putting up more unrealistic numbers. As pointed out before, Duncan has been MVP, and led his team to back-to-back titles. If anything, I would say KG is a bit high.
|
|
|
Post by New Orleans Hornets on Aug 14, 2008 7:05:02 GMT -5
hey SEA waht do you think about what DEN said
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Aug 14, 2008 14:44:32 GMT -5
i agree with cleveland... i dont see why duncan would be rated lower than kg then i could make the same argument that Howard should be rated as good as TD , because he has put up better stats than Duncan, but im not gonn aocmplain because everyones rating is fair, KG has been a 97 for a long time, and TD has been in the 90-93 range for a while, both r good ratings IMO Realistically can u say Dwight Howard is even on the same level as Tim Duncan. Duncan is the best power forward in nba history by most experts there is no way he should be below a 93 or near amare or dwight, or below kg. Hell if Duncan gets a boost he will dominate the west just like he has but its fair he deserves to be at that level of rating as Kobe,kg...the man is the mvp and a two time champion. 26 and 10 plus the mvp, fair is fair and he has outplayed and dominated every big in this game. Realistically if you guys can tell me kg deserves to be 5 points higher than Duncan u should disregard this post.
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Aug 14, 2008 14:47:49 GMT -5
then i could make the same argument that Howard should be rated as good as TD , because he has put up better stats than Duncan, but im not gonn aocmplain because everyones rating is fair, KG has been a 97 for a long time, and TD has been in the 90-93 range for a while, both r good ratings IMO Realistically can u say Dwight Howard is even on the same level as Tim Duncan. Duncan is the best power forward in nba history by most experts there is no way he should be below a 93 or near amare or dwight, or below kg. Hell if Duncan gets a boost he will dominate the west just like he has but its fair he deserves to be at that level of rating as Kobe,kg...the man is the mvp and a two time champion. 26 and 10 plus the mvp, fair is fair and he has outplayed and dominated every big in this game. Realistically if you guys can tell me kg deserves to be 5 points higher than Duncan u should disregard this post. which i exactly what ill do becaue i think duncan needs to stay where he is
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Aug 14, 2008 15:08:28 GMT -5
y is that pistons lol
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Aug 14, 2008 15:15:59 GMT -5
i mean he is a really good PF but 93 i a good rating for a guy like him, imo if he didt go up lat year after he won a championship why should he this year when he didnt?
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Aug 14, 2008 15:31:01 GMT -5
i mean he is a really good PF but 93 i a good rating for a guy like him, imo if he didt go up lat year after he won a championship why should he this year when he didnt? good...the dude is the best pf. See it would not be a problem if kg was not 97 and has not done anything close to a what td has done in this league. Do u agree that td is better or even with kg both in the nba and this league
|
|