|
Post by sharmoot - POR on Aug 21, 2008 18:27:03 GMT -5
See that? That's the exclusive reaction of Dwayne Wade after he heard that he was finally being traded. We caught up with Dwayne just after that moment there where we asked him, whats it like being traded? "There was absolutely no way I was going to stay in Indiana, nor did I want to stay, the amount of disrespect i had from the management where they offered Kevin Durant for me and he ACCEPTED? Your kidding me, you may aswell spit in my face."A few minutes after he had calmed down we asked him how he feels about going to the Knicks, he said he was thankful for getting out of Indiana and thanked the Knicks for giving up potential youth for him and that he will make sure that he makes up for the lost youth in the team. Wade also expressed that if Indiana and himself ever cross path in a game, he'll make sure their team sit's there and ponders where it all went wrong in the Dwayne Wade trade. He said "You don't just offer me up to the whole league for virtually no price, if you didn't want me here in the first place dont trade for me".Obviously Dwayne was never happy in Indiana and now that he gets fresh Start in NY its time for him to move forward and hit his 2005 Finals MVP form.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Aug 21, 2008 19:02:27 GMT -5
IMO D-wade, better Durant than 2 rookies and a 7'0 300 pound pile of shit.
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Aug 21, 2008 19:06:14 GMT -5
IMO D-wade, better Durant than 2 rookies and a 7'0 300 pound pile of shit. I rather have Bynum, then a one dimensional chucker in Durant. when Bynum was HEALTHY the Lakers were in FIRST PLACE and that was before Gasol. and what did Durant do, oh yeah, just lead them to the 2nd worst record in the Western Conference. BTW enjoy another 1st rd. beating with Artest.
|
|
|
Post by sharmoot - POR on Aug 21, 2008 19:13:10 GMT -5
He couldve easily gotten another superstar in return though, its not like he was age-ing or something, that was my point i guess
couldve easily gotten a GREAT superstar in return but oh well
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Aug 21, 2008 23:10:10 GMT -5
IMO D-wade, better Durant than 2 rookies and a 7'0 300 pound pile of shit. I rather have Bynum, then a one dimensional chucker in Durant. when Bynum was HEALTHY the Lakers were in FIRST PLACE and that was before Gasol. and what did Durant do, oh yeah, just lead them to the 2nd worst record in the Western Conference. BTW enjoy another 1st rd. beating with Artest. Come one bro, Bynum didn't lead that team anywhere. The Lakers have the best player in the game in Kobe, and a pretty good team around him. Bynum is good but if you put Bynum on that Seattle team, they wouldn't be any good either. Durant was on a terrible team , don't comapre the two. I absolutley love the fact that people want to attach labels to a 19-20 year old kid who just finished his rookie season, it's pretty funny. I guess rookies never improve.
|
|
|
Post by sharmoot - POR on Aug 22, 2008 11:09:50 GMT -5
which is true, thats why the trade was rejected lol no no but still if you had a 93 rated player would u trade him for an 80?
|
|
|
Post by Boston Celtics on Aug 22, 2008 14:20:57 GMT -5
It depends on the situation. If I was in Indy's situation with a ton of terrible contracts, couldn't re-sign my starting PG, and had no other real tradeable players, as all of my other worthwhile players had bad contracts. Then yes, I would move the 93 to start the rebuilding process.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Aug 22, 2008 14:32:41 GMT -5
There both crappy trades for IND imo, at least he got Durant though (who should be an 85 next year) back for Dwade. I still don't see why IND didn't let Harris walk and start Rondo?
|
|