|
CHA/SAC
Dec 25, 2007 17:54:44 GMT -5
Post by okimrichard - PHX/BOS on Dec 25, 2007 17:54:44 GMT -5
TEAM 1 SAC TRADES: Sam Cassell - 73 - $6,150,000 09 2nd rnder NJ 09 2nd rnder
TEAM 1 SAC RECEIVES: Jamaal Tinsley - 75 - $6,300,000 $6,750,000 $7,200,000 $7,500,000
TOTAL INCOMING SALARY: $6,300,000 TOTAL OUTGOING SALARY: $6,150,000
TEAM 2 CHA TRADES: Jamaal Tinsley - 75 - $6,300,000 $6,750,000 $7,200,000 $7,500,000
TEAM 2 CHA RECEIVES: Sam Cassell - 73 - $6,150,000 08 2nd rnder 09 2nd rnder
TOTAL INCOMING SALARY: $6,150,000 TOTAL OUTGOING SALARY: $6,300,000
as gm of sac i accept
|
|
|
CHA/SAC
Dec 25, 2007 21:38:14 GMT -5
Post by frankg90 - CHA on Dec 25, 2007 21:38:14 GMT -5
i accept...i get rid of a longer salary because tinsley is too expensive on the bench for me
|
|
|
CHA/SAC
Dec 26, 2007 0:02:22 GMT -5
Post by Chicago Bulls on Dec 26, 2007 0:02:22 GMT -5
I accept, Tinsley has been playing pretty good in real life so he's proven he can still be a starting PG
|
|
|
CHA/SAC
Dec 26, 2007 0:05:48 GMT -5
Post by Orlando Magic on Dec 26, 2007 0:05:48 GMT -5
im not exactly behind ur reasoning here CHA? Tinsley, as CHI said, is playing well in real life and is only 200k more in salary than an OLD as balls Cassell. So why would you downgrade from a still rising tinsley to cassell who is plummeting IMO. (200k and two 09 2nds are not worth it) sorry but i cant accept yet, no rejection persay but id just like to know a better explanation
|
|
|
CHA/SAC
Dec 26, 2007 0:09:36 GMT -5
Post by okimrichard - PHX/BOS on Dec 26, 2007 0:09:36 GMT -5
it may be that cassell is a FA after this year tho. he saves money prob but lets hear from him. and jack will now start who is younger and on a better team in the nba in portland and dooling will back him up who isnt bad either.
|
|
|
CHA/SAC
Dec 26, 2007 0:12:45 GMT -5
Post by frankg90 - CHA on Dec 26, 2007 0:12:45 GMT -5
yea 4 years with a big salary for a guy that would be my backup pg is not what im looking for. cassell will fill that role well this year and then give me flexibility in the offseason
|
|
|
CHA/SAC
Dec 26, 2007 8:04:00 GMT -5
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Dec 26, 2007 8:04:00 GMT -5
This is one of those deals where I wouldn't trade Tinsley for Cassell personally, but the ratings are close, and I can't say whether or not someone has a personal "beef" with Tinsley for example, and maybe doesn't want him on their team for one reason or another. I think the money saved in the coming years is a good enough reason, plus 2 2nd rounders which could be something ok.
I accept.
|
|
|
CHA/SAC
Dec 26, 2007 10:46:42 GMT -5
Post by Orlando Magic on Dec 26, 2007 10:46:42 GMT -5
ok, i didnt see that cassell only had one year left, so in that case i dont agree with dealing tinsley but ill accept
|
|
|
CHA/SAC
Dec 26, 2007 14:20:43 GMT -5
Post by Utah Jazz on Dec 26, 2007 14:20:43 GMT -5
Accept. Charlotte gets an expiring and a couple of picks when Sacramento upgrades his PG position.
|
|
|
CHA/SAC
Dec 26, 2007 14:24:17 GMT -5
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Dec 26, 2007 14:24:17 GMT -5
trade is approved
update charts ASAP
|
|