|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Jan 30, 2010 16:04:17 GMT -5
Guys, an injury isn't an excuse for voters. They aren't going to give him the benefit of the doubt because he was injured. They will see whats on the paper. 4 great seasons, 2 good seasons. Great Years (HOF years): 1999, 2000, 2001, 2008 Good years: 2007, 2009 By comparison, 10 other QB's this year had similar years to Warner's "good" years. He has the best 3 passing games in Superbowl history? The guy gets it done in the clutch, who cares about regular season?
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Jan 30, 2010 18:48:40 GMT -5
Regular season is a bigger sample size and would most definitely outweigh post season accomplishments/stats for me if I had a vote.
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs on Jan 30, 2010 20:21:19 GMT -5
Regular season matters, but in the Super Bowl.. it's all about it.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Jan 30, 2010 22:26:13 GMT -5
Regular season is a bigger sample size and would most definitely outweigh post season accomplishments/stats for me if I had a vote. HE HAS TOP 3 PASSING GAMES IN SUPERBOWL HISTORY, the guy can play QB. Okay he had injury problems, doesn't mean he isn't what made the greatest show on turf go!
|
|
|
Post by Atlanta Hawks on Jan 31, 2010 1:58:43 GMT -5
Guys, an injury isn't an excuse for voters. They aren't going to give him the benefit of the doubt because he was injured. They will see whats on the paper. 4 great seasons, 2 good seasons. Great Years (HOF years): 1999, 2000, 2001, 2008 Good years: 2007, 2009 By comparison, 10 other QB's this year had similar years to Warner's "good" years. It wasn't just injuries. He started his career in the NFL at 28. That is at least 6 years later than the vast majority of all other NFL players. He plays those 6 years and he's at least top 4 in passing yards and TD's. I'd agree that he was borderline HOF just looking at his regular season stats but his post-season dominance elevates him to the HOF easily.
|
|