|
Post by Philadelphia 76ers on Jan 25, 2009 16:11:10 GMT -5
Milwaukee trades:90 | Tony Parker: $11,550,000 | $12,600,000 | $13,500,000 Total Incoming: $12,804,000 Total Outgoing: $11,550,000 Philadelphia trades:89 | Gilbert Arenas - $12,804,000 Total Incoming: $11,550,000 Total Outgoing: $12,804,000
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia 76ers on Jan 25, 2009 16:12:47 GMT -5
I accept, my team has been struggling as of late and Gilbert hasn't met expectations after a great playoffs last season. A change was needed and I feel like this is the right move to get my team back on the winning track.
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Raptors on Jan 26, 2009 16:25:48 GMT -5
I accept, yes I lose TP but i also lose his contract and yes Arenas is injury prone but TP just hasnt been consistant for me
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Jan 26, 2009 18:05:55 GMT -5
I really dont like this trade at all.
Arenas is going down in rating this year and has a expiring contract and wont be an easy guy to sign. Plus if you think Parker is playing bad what do you think Arenas will do? Take away shots from Wade.
I'll give Milwaukee a chance to defend himself but im leaning towards rejecting
It kinda looks like your just making a trade to make a trade
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia 76ers on Jan 26, 2009 18:14:59 GMT -5
I don't see how this is rejectable. Why should Arenas go down in rating when we haven't had a fair chance to evaluate him?
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Jan 26, 2009 19:23:07 GMT -5
TP has a great contract, while it will prob take 17-19 mil to get Gilbert with increase. Like I said, I want to hear from MIL
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia 76ers on Jan 26, 2009 20:51:00 GMT -5
If Arenas' rating is going to go down, why would it take an 7mil more than what he's making right now to re-sign him?
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Jan 26, 2009 21:30:04 GMT -5
If Arenas' rating is going to go down, why would it take an 7mil more than what he's making right now to re-sign him? because he would still be a 86-87 is somewhat of a "star" so he would demand so big $ but like I said let me hear from MIL
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia 76ers on Jan 26, 2009 21:45:12 GMT -5
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. IMO you should only reject a lopsided trade, this doesn't look lopsided to me.
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Jan 26, 2009 22:08:45 GMT -5
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. IMO you should only reject a lopsided trade, this doesn't look lopsided to me. Of course it doesn't look lopsided to you, you are part of the trade. I don't like it for MIL for 2 reasons. 1, Wade and Arenas are similar players that need the ball and are shoot 1st players. With Parker, he has that pure PG skill. 2, Arenas is a FA and its always tough to have that weigh on a franchise. Nonetheless, the trade is pretty fair on paper. Ill accept.
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Jan 26, 2009 22:14:49 GMT -5
Yea, this is another of the "i don't like it, but that doesn't mean I'll reject it" trades. I wouldn't do it...but it's not really rejectable IMO.
Accept.
|
|
|
Post by Orlando Magic on Jan 26, 2009 22:17:39 GMT -5
i agree with OKC 100%, on paper, fair trade. For MIL, Parker will end up costing less and will do more than Arenas will
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Jan 26, 2009 22:25:52 GMT -5
I guess I'll just go with the crowd and accept
I guess it isn't really bad enough to reject but MIL will be wishing he hadn't done this in a few weeks, at least I think
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia 76ers on Jan 27, 2009 11:23:51 GMT -5
Sweet, I can update my charts now right?
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Jan 27, 2009 13:20:21 GMT -5
Trade approved
Update charts ASAP
|
|