|
IND/BOS
Aug 19, 2008 18:27:51 GMT -5
Post by Orlando Magic on Aug 19, 2008 18:27:51 GMT -5
I reject, I don't understand how IND can turn down countless other offers and then accept a deal that is essentially for durant. Durant is good and he certainly will get better...but is nowhere near D Wade and I reject this on the same grounds that I rejected the NJN/PHO deal of Nash for Mayo.
|
|
|
IND/BOS
Aug 19, 2008 19:03:08 GMT -5
Post by New Jersey Nets on Aug 19, 2008 19:03:08 GMT -5
You can compare this trade with the NJ-PHO one, but Wade's values are way higher....he is one of the top players while he is still young...Nash wasnt that good, actually HE SUCKED in his 1st years...I dont know what did he do but after some years he became one of the best after sucking for the 1st years in the NBA...anyway I traded a huge prospect, two 2nd rounders, McCants and Alston who are improving and a great expiring for a top guy that has 2 good years left until he starts declining....so I think that trade was acceptable...
I dont really know about this one...right now it isnt that good...but maybe in the future it could be a 90 for an 87 (I see Durant being way better than Josh Howard) and a 75-79 (Belinelli might be good) so it would be a good deal for both but I really dont know about this right now....
|
|
|
IND/BOS
Aug 19, 2008 19:47:13 GMT -5
Post by theanswer - IND on Aug 19, 2008 19:47:13 GMT -5
ok so how can we make this happen then what does boston have to add to make this work i dont see what is wrong with this as nj said bellnelli could be a 75-79 rating soon and durant could be 87-90 maybe more durant could be the next dwade i am rebuilding and want to lose cap space. ok so say i was booted and someone came in and picked up the pacers would they rather have -7mil in cap with wade or 7+ free in cap with durant and maybe devin harris with other studs please rethink this. thanks
|
|
|
IND/BOS
Aug 19, 2008 19:51:03 GMT -5
Post by New Jersey Nets on Aug 19, 2008 19:51:03 GMT -5
You can compare this trade with the NJ-PHO one, but Wade's values are way higher....he is one of the top players while he is still young...Nash wasnt that good, actually HE SUCKED in his 1st years...I dont know what did he do but after some years he became one of the best after sucking for the 1st years in the NBA...anyway I traded a huge prospect, two 2nd rounders, McCants and Alston who are improving and a great expiring for a top guy that has 2 good years left until he starts declining....so I think that trade was acceptable... I dont really know about this one...right now it isnt that good...but maybe in the future it could be a 90 for an 87 (I see Durant being way better than Josh Howard) and a 75-79 (Belinelli might be good) so it would be a good deal for both but I really dont know about this right now.... im gonna delete my post in about 10 mins but guys DONT POST IF YOUR NOT A CM OR A PERSON IN THE TRADE IN THIS THREAD Hey I just posted here because my deal was mentioned here so I have the rights to say my opinion right? or should I create a new thread just to "answer" something here? if I do that nobody would read that... And posting here just to say "Do not post here" is a cheap way to post pad or whatever u wanna do
|
|
|
IND/BOS
Aug 20, 2008 0:08:50 GMT -5
Post by sharmoot - POR on Aug 20, 2008 0:08:50 GMT -5
dont you have to wait til thsi trade is officially rejected before posting another trade for similar players? :S what if this miraculously goes through
|
|
|
IND/BOS
Aug 20, 2008 11:13:56 GMT -5
Post by Philadelphia 76ers on Aug 20, 2008 11:13:56 GMT -5
I'm gonna reject this too, Durant is gonna be good but DWade is still one of the top players in the NBA, Bellnelli is an average prospect, doesn't look like he's gonna be getting minutes. Indy does lose a bad contract in Blount but still won't have enough cap to re-sign Harris. This is essentially Durant for Wade IMO
|
|