|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 22, 2008 19:42:43 GMT -5
Post by Chicago Bulls on Apr 22, 2008 19:42:43 GMT -5
If need be (and allowed by Seattle) I'd be willing to rework this if Detroit would be
|
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 22, 2008 19:49:38 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Apr 22, 2008 19:49:38 GMT -5
If need be (and allowed by Seattle) I'd be willing to rework this if Detroit would be i think it will still probally get accepted, at least i think so until there are 4 rejects(which i dont think will be) but if there are ill re work it but lets see what happens |
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 22, 2008 23:08:30 GMT -5
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Apr 22, 2008 23:08:30 GMT -5
Waiting on Charlotte and New Orleans to vote.
2-2 right now
Milwaukee will be the tie-breaker if it gets that far.
|
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 23, 2008 3:00:20 GMT -5
Post by New Orleans Hornets on Apr 23, 2008 3:00:20 GMT -5
i'll accept this as well
i also think CHI is in rebuilding mode and this will help him get a lot of cap space for years to come
|
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 23, 2008 18:10:52 GMT -5
Post by Philadelphia 76ers on Apr 23, 2008 18:10:52 GMT -5
I have been told to be the designated voter for Charlotte.
Honestly, I don't like this trade for Chicago at all. Houston has shown flashes lately and with the addition of Josh Smith, they're only going to get better. I think Chicago is giving up too much for a pick in the 4-6 range. Although Ford is an injury concern, he's shown he can put up good numbers when givin the minutes. TT has tons of potential and can be a star in a few years. I reject
|
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 23, 2008 18:30:17 GMT -5
Post by Chicago Bulls on Apr 23, 2008 18:30:17 GMT -5
Would you guys accept this is it was Cleveland's 2008 1st in stead of TT?(I'll also have to ask Detroit if he still would do it)
|
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 23, 2008 18:35:18 GMT -5
Post by Utah Jazz on Apr 23, 2008 18:35:18 GMT -5
I'd probably accept, yes.
|
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 23, 2008 18:35:42 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Apr 23, 2008 18:35:42 GMT -5
Would you guys accept this is it was Cleveland's 2008 1st in stead of TT?(I'll also have to ask Detroit if he still would do it) sry chi but i would not do that deal i think this deal is fine and really isnt unfair at all |
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 23, 2008 19:04:09 GMT -5
Post by supremegm - MIA on Apr 23, 2008 19:04:09 GMT -5
i know my opinion means nothing, but...
why would chicago do this trade?
tyrus thomas was like a 2nd or 3rd overall pick himself... maybe if this trade was TT for the pick straight up, then i think it would be fair
but why is tj ford involved???
chicago cant even be trying to tank because he doesnt own his own pick... dunno why he would do this
|
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 23, 2008 22:38:00 GMT -5
Post by Denver Nuggets on Apr 23, 2008 22:38:00 GMT -5
i know my opinion means nothing, but... why would chicago do this trade? tyrus thomas was like a 2nd or 3rd overall pick himself... maybe if this trade was TT for the pick straight up, then i think it would be fair but why is tj ford involved??? chicago cant even be trying to tank because he doesnt own his own pick... dunno why he would do this +1 |
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 24, 2008 6:19:23 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Apr 24, 2008 6:19:23 GMT -5
hasnt sea stated that only cms and people involved in the trade talk on this thread, make a own thread if u feel u wanna talk about it
|
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 24, 2008 7:20:08 GMT -5
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Apr 24, 2008 7:20:08 GMT -5
I think we're tied 3-3 right now right?
|
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 24, 2008 17:10:08 GMT -5
Post by frankg90 - CHA on Apr 24, 2008 17:10:08 GMT -5
I accept this...i understand that CHI is giving away its whole team but he does have the right to rebulid and this will definitely do that. He isnt getting a great deal but it is not enough to reject.
|
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 24, 2008 18:11:52 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Apr 24, 2008 18:11:52 GMT -5
sweet 4-3
close one
|
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 25, 2008 14:59:04 GMT -5
Post by Orlando Magic on Apr 25, 2008 14:59:04 GMT -5
well, out of the teams involved in this trade, i would like to say that I, in fact, win this trade! First off, DET further ruins their team's chemistry with the multiple lineup potentials. This helps me because now I need to only battle MIL for the top slot in the East. Second, I win this trade because CHI has officially sunk himself with this deal. This benefits me for obvious reasons because now I have a GREAT chance at locking up the #1 pick!!! WELCOME TO THE FUTURE CHAMPS ROSE!
|
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 25, 2008 16:25:40 GMT -5
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Apr 25, 2008 16:25:40 GMT -5
Don't count out how bad my team is haha. Around the deadline I moved Bogut (79) and Mobley (77) yea he was bench but still that rating...and the best thing I added around the deadline was Dorell Wright (73)...I honestly think I'm still headed for #1, especially since I still have a head start over Chicago anyway.
|
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 25, 2008 16:34:28 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Apr 25, 2008 16:34:28 GMT -5
well, out of the teams involved in this trade, i would like to say that I, in fact, win this trade! First off, DET further ruins their team's chemistry with the multiple lineup potentials. This helps me because now I need to only battle MIL for the top slot in the East. Second, I win this trade because CHI has officially sunk himself with this deal. This benefits me for obvious reasons because now I have a GREAT chance at locking up the #1 pick!!! WELCOME TO THE FUTURE CHAMPS ROSE! somone is really cocky first off this dosent mak emy chemistry worse it hadnt been good with j.smith now look at my bench 80-Ford 74-Peterson 70-Maxiell 70-Hayes 69-Stuckey 60-Johnson 60-Afflalo plus a great starting 5 in cbill,jrich,tt,sheed, and d-weezy and we have a lottery so dont get all excited about getting the 1st pick Ill be looking forward to seeing you in the playoffs(if we both get that far) |
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 25, 2008 17:32:53 GMT -5
Post by Boston Celtics on Apr 25, 2008 17:32:53 GMT -5
Just my 2 cents on the trade. I don't really get it from either teams point of view. For Chicago, I think you could have gotten more for a Ford/Thomas combo than the posibility of having a top 5 pick. For Detroit, he now has his work cut out for him to resign Howard. His cap next season is just under $66,000,000 (considering he picks up the options for Thomas and Maxiell). He will have to cut about $16,000,000 in the off-season to match the type of offers that Howard would get in free-agency. However teams make trades for their own reasons, so best of luck to you guys.
|
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 25, 2008 18:36:13 GMT -5
Post by Chicago Bulls on Apr 25, 2008 18:36:13 GMT -5
For Detroit, he now has his work cut out for him to resign Howard. His cap next season is just under $66,000,000 (considering he picks up the options for Thomas and Maxiell). He will have to cut about $16,000,000 in the off-season to match the type of offers that Howard would get in free-agency. Thats also part of the reason why I did it (plus with the expiring contracts of Rip and Mason I'll have $40 mill in cap space this offseason) |
|
|
|
DET/CHI
Apr 25, 2008 18:45:31 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Apr 25, 2008 18:45:31 GMT -5
Just my 2 cents on the trade. I don't really get it from either teams point of view. For Chicago, I think you could have gotten more for a Ford/Thomas combo than the posibility of having a top 5 pick. For Detroit, he now has his work cut out for him to resign Howard. His cap next season is just under $66,000,000 (considering he picks up the options for Thomas and Maxiell). He will have to cut about $16,000,000 in the off-season to match the type of offers that Howard would get in free-agency. However teams make trades for their own reasons, so best of luck to you guys. thanks man i really dont plan on kepping ford next year ill probally ditch him and battie for a pick |
|
-
-
-
-
