|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 6:01:37 GMT -5
Post by Dallas Mavericks on Apr 11, 2008 6:01:37 GMT -5
Dallas sends
82 | Stephon Marbury -------- 19,012,500 --- 20,840,625(TO) 83 | Corey Maggette --------- 7,000,000 ---- 7,000,000(TO) 69 | Desagana Diop --------- 2,146,000
dallas recieves
83 | Zach Randolph----- $13,333,333 --- $14,666,667 --- $16,000,000 --- $17,333,333 85 | Rashard Lewis 85 ----- $10,200,554 --- $10,600,554 --- $11,000,554 71 | Luke Ridnour 71 ----- $6,500,000 --- $6,500,000 --- $6,500,000
total incoming salary 30,033,887
total outcoming salary 28,158,500
-------------------------------
Portland recieves
82 | Stephon Marbury -------- 19,012,500 --- 20,840,625(TO) 83 | Corey Maggette --------- 7,000,000 ---- 7,000,000(TO) 69 | Desagana Diop --------- 2,146,000
portland sends
83 | Zach Randolph----- $13,333,333 --- $14,666,667 --- $16,000,000 --- $17,333,333 85 | Rashard Lewis 85 ----- $10,200,554 --- $10,600,554 --- $11,000,554 71 | Luke Ridnour 71 ----- $6,500,000 --- $6,500,000 --- $6,500,000
total outcoming salary 30,033,887
total incoming salary 28,158,500
---------------------------
i accept, i believe randolph can play C and i get a superstar SF, i might make some moves after this one
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 6:03:46 GMT -5
Post by sharmoot - POR on Apr 11, 2008 6:03:46 GMT -5
i accept i get that contract of marburys which has a team option for the last year solid SF in magette, which will help roy get some more scoring rooM i can finally slide alrdirdge down to the PF spot marbury can also lead at PG and lets see how we go
lewis n randolph didnt work , lets hope magette and roy will
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 7:42:19 GMT -5
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Apr 11, 2008 7:42:19 GMT -5
I truly don't understand this trade for Portland's side. Even if this is a salary dump, its a whole lot to give up, IMO.
Here's my breakdown:
Randolph > Marbury Ridnour = Diop Lewis >> Maggette
Every part of this trade favors Dallas.
I would like a more in detail explanation from Portland before I vote. Is this just a salary dump?
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 7:45:51 GMT -5
Post by Dallas Mavericks on Apr 11, 2008 7:45:51 GMT -5
I truly don't understand this trade for Portland's side. Even if this is a salary dump, its a whole lot to give up, IMO. Here's my breakdown: Randolph > Marbury Ridnour = Diop Lewis >> Maggette Every part of this trade favors Dallas. I would like a more in detail explanation from Portland before I vote. Is this just a salary dump? does this mean i may have to add more?
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 7:48:28 GMT -5
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Apr 11, 2008 7:48:28 GMT -5
I truly don't understand this trade for Portland's side. Even if this is a salary dump, its a whole lot to give up, IMO. Here's my breakdown: Randolph > Marbury Ridnour = Diop Lewis >> Maggette Every part of this trade favors Dallas. I would like a more in detail explanation from Portland before I vote. Is this just a salary dump? does this mean i may have to add more? Not necessarily. I want to hear Portland's plan and what direction he is taking his team.
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 8:34:14 GMT -5
Post by sharmoot - POR on Apr 11, 2008 8:34:14 GMT -5
the randolph and lewis combination hasnt been working for me in the past 2 (1 and a half) seasons, id preferably want to get rid of randolph only, but no1 wants to take his contract at all. atleast ill get some cap room next season (with marburys contract TO next season) and see how maggette goes and if he doesnt play well, then i wont pick up his option either, and if i do, then he'll be of good trade value because of his contract. honestly wouldve liked more in this deal as im giving lewis and randolph, but we negotiated for a while and this is the best we could come up with. im trying 2 build around aldridge, roy, webster, outlaw = youth. thats my direction of the team. i mean, you've got to admit, my team has been disapointing this year.
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 8:50:41 GMT -5
Post by Dallas Mavericks on Apr 11, 2008 8:50:41 GMT -5
maybe that explains everything. now can SEA accept?
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 9:13:10 GMT -5
Post by Utah Jazz on Apr 11, 2008 9:13:10 GMT -5
I'm not really a fan of this for Portland. I can see why he would want to move Randolph, but that price is pretty steep. I'll wait a little while longer to make my decision, but IMO, if Lewis and Maggette were taken out, it'd be more acceptable. And trust me Dallas, Z-Bo's best position isn't center.
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 9:30:46 GMT -5
Post by sharmoot - POR on Apr 11, 2008 9:30:46 GMT -5
I'm not really a fan of this for Portland. I can see why he would want to move Randolph, but that price is pretty steep. I'll wait a little while longer to make my decision, but IMO, if Lewis and Maggette were taken out, it'd be more acceptable. And trust me Dallas, Z-Bo's best position isn't center. actually u know what, that seems like quite a nice deal but anyway we dont have a choice, we will wait and see.
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 17:47:09 GMT -5
Post by Cleveland Cavaliers on Apr 11, 2008 17:47:09 GMT -5
the trade is absolutely fine in my opinion. let the gm's trade.
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 20:06:10 GMT -5
Post by Chicago Bulls on Apr 11, 2008 20:06:10 GMT -5
the trade is absolutely fine in my opinion. let the gm's trade. Yeah the trade is absolutely fine..............besides the fact that it's unfair, thats why theirs a trade committee. (note this isn't me rejecting this trade but I do think it needs to be tweaked a bit to be accepted.)
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 20:25:29 GMT -5
Post by Cleveland Cavaliers on Apr 11, 2008 20:25:29 GMT -5
well the trade committe throws around the word unfair a whole lot. You guys reject trades that honestly aren't that bad. I'm a firm believer in letting the gm's trade freely without the nazi trade committe analyzing the trade like thier trying to find the cure for cancer. Let the GM's do what they wan't. The trade committe shouldnt even be used unless the trade is ridiculously bad. but for a trade like this just let it go through. let the gm's be the death of thier franchise. it's more realistic that way.
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 20:35:25 GMT -5
Post by Chicago Bulls on Apr 11, 2008 20:35:25 GMT -5
well the trade committe throws around the word unfair a whole lot. You guys reject trades that honestly aren't that bad. I'm a firm believer in letting the gm's trade freely without the nazi trade committe analyzing the trade like thier trying to find the cure for cancer. Let the GM's do what they wan't. The trade committe shouldnt even be used unless the trade is ridiculously bad. but for a trade like this just let it go through. let the gm's be the death of thier franchise. it's more realistic that way. If we do that we'll end up with a bunch of shitty teams and GM's will quite after their teams star to suck bad enough and no one will want to pick up those teams as a new GM
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 21:07:25 GMT -5
Post by Detroit Pistons on Apr 11, 2008 21:07:25 GMT -5
well the trade committe throws around the word unfair a whole lot. You guys reject trades that honestly aren't that bad. I'm a firm believer in letting the gm's trade freely without the nazi trade committe analyzing the trade like thier trying to find the cure for cancer. Let the GM's do what they wan't. The trade committe shouldnt even be used unless the trade is ridiculously bad. but for a trade like this just let it go through. let the gm's be the death of thier franchise. it's more realistic that way. you obiously dont know how sim leagues work, if we allow that this league would go down the drain dont question the admins i like it how u call them the nazi trade committe i agree with sea, no point for por to do this, even if lewis and randolph are strugiling
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 21:58:56 GMT -5
Post by Utah Jazz on Apr 11, 2008 21:58:56 GMT -5
well the trade committe throws around the word unfair a whole lot. You guys reject trades that honestly aren't that bad. I'm a firm believer in letting the gm's trade freely without the nazi trade committe analyzing the trade like thier trying to find the cure for cancer. Let the GM's do what they wan't. The trade committe shouldnt even be used unless the trade is ridiculously bad. but for a trade like this just let it go through. let the gm's be the death of thier franchise. it's more realistic that way. That's the exact opposite of what's supposed to happen... I'll go ahead and reject this. I get why Portland's doing this, but it doesn't really need to do it. I think the core deal would be Marbury/Diop for Randolph/Ridnour, and that's fair. The Maggette-Lewis swap just kills it for Portland, since Lewis exceeds in sims and Maggette is about average, not to mention Lewis is better in real life. That's just my thoughts, I don't want the other CM's to follow my centiments exactly, just expressing what I was thinking.
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 22:07:13 GMT -5
Post by Dallas Mavericks on Apr 11, 2008 22:07:13 GMT -5
well the trade committe throws around the word unfair a whole lot. You guys reject trades that honestly aren't that bad. I'm a firm believer in letting the gm's trade freely without the nazi trade committe analyzing the trade like thier trying to find the cure for cancer. Let the GM's do what they wan't. The trade committe shouldnt even be used unless the trade is ridiculously bad. but for a trade like this just let it go through. let the gm's be the death of thier franchise. it's more realistic that way. That's the exact opposite of what's supposed to happen... I'll go ahead and reject this. I get why Portland's doing this, but it doesn't really need to do it. I think the core deal would be Marbury/Diop for Randolph/Ridnour, and that's fair. The Maggette-Lewis swap just kills it for Portland, since Lewis exceeds in sims and Maggette is about average, not to mention Lewis is better in real life. That's just my thoughts, I don't want the other CM's to follow my centiments exactly, just expressing what I was thinking. the reason why im doing this trade is because im getting lewis and randolph, i dont want to get randolph alone. im gonna wait for the other cm's to chek this
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 22:16:27 GMT -5
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Apr 11, 2008 22:16:27 GMT -5
First thing I thought when I saw this was "what the hell?" Just being honest. I'm rejecting it as well. I see the salary evacuation here, and I kind of see why Portland is doing it...but I don't think he has to do this exact thing.
Also, Dallas you don't need to explain to us why you're doing this deal...it favors you easily, no explanation needed.
Reject for me.
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 11, 2008 23:03:00 GMT -5
Post by sharmoot - POR on Apr 11, 2008 23:03:00 GMT -5
i guess i see where all the GM's are coming from as to regards of rejecting it i think i just rushed it a little because this is the first real offer where ive gotten an offer for randolph, in-experience (on the trade part) on my behalf, we will jhust have to wait and see where this leads us
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 12, 2008 1:29:38 GMT -5
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Apr 12, 2008 1:29:38 GMT -5
There is no reason why Cleveland or Detroit should be posting in this thread. I've stated on numerous occasions the only people that should post in a trade thread are: the parties involved in the deal and the staff. Outside opinions are not needed or wanted. All they do is provoke unnecessary bickering back and forth. Thats what the post-trade polls are for. Give your opinion there.
As for this trade itself. I will accept it becasue I trust Portland as a GM and he wont abandon his team once in rebuild mode, as he has been here since the beginning of this league.
|
|
|
DAL/POR
Apr 12, 2008 7:03:32 GMT -5
Post by Los Angeles Clippers on Apr 12, 2008 7:03:32 GMT -5
Alright, myself and Utah have rejected, Seattle has accepted.
|
|