|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Dec 21, 2007 22:09:00 GMT -5
I don't know how these are determined and how much they really mean, but here they are.
Team Ratings: New Orleans - 95 Milwaukee - 94 Phoenix - 94 Detroit - 94 Golden State - 92 Orlando - 92 Seattle - 91 Memphis - 91 Toronto - 91 Denver - 90 Utah - 90 Philadelphia - 89 Washington - 89 New Jersey - 87 LA Lakers - 86 Charlotte - 86 Minnesota - 86 Portland - 85 Cleveland - 84 Dallas - 83 Chicago - 83 Indiana - 82 Miami - 82 San Antonio - 81 Sacramento - 81 Boston - 81 LA Clippers - 78 New York - 78 Houston - 77 Atlanta - 77
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Dec 21, 2007 22:11:46 GMT -5
New Orleans - 95 Milwaukee - 94 Phoenix - 94 Detroit - 94
4 best teams 4 best ratings
|
|
|
Post by raps03 - TOR on Dec 21, 2007 22:13:56 GMT -5
nice 91
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Dec 21, 2007 23:00:05 GMT -5
Top half, I'm good.
|
|
|
Post by shayan - GSW on Dec 21, 2007 23:26:21 GMT -5
92 cool
|
|
|
Post by Atlanta Hawks on Dec 22, 2007 0:35:32 GMT -5
77, woot woot
|
|
|
Post by Memphis Grizzlies on Dec 22, 2007 0:37:37 GMT -5
is there offense/defense team ratings as well?
im suprised im so high, probably cause of my league-best bench
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Dec 22, 2007 7:37:34 GMT -5
is there offense/defense team ratings as well? im suprised im so high, probably cause of my league-best bench yeah, r there offense and d ratings
|
|
|
Post by corey - NYK/CHA on Dec 22, 2007 7:45:47 GMT -5
Yayy. Hopefully my rating translates to a top-3 pick.
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia 76ers on Dec 22, 2007 9:56:52 GMT -5
Not bad, 89 will do for now
|
|
|
Post by corey - NYK/CHA on Dec 22, 2007 10:12:24 GMT -5
lol @ lakers all the way down at 86.
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Dec 22, 2007 11:28:57 GMT -5
87...not bad ;D
: New Orleans - 95 Milwaukee - 94 Phoenix - 94 Detroit - 94
one of those 4 are the next champs
|
|
|
Post by corey - NYK/CHA on Dec 22, 2007 12:44:32 GMT -5
Pff. I have just as good of a chance to win as them.
LOL
|
|
|
Post by New Orleans Hornets on Dec 22, 2007 17:14:30 GMT -5
WOW I THOUGHT DETROIT AND PHOENIX WOULD ALSO BE RATED 95
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bulls on Dec 22, 2007 17:22:22 GMT -5
I don't know how these are determined and how much they really mean, but here they are. I'm going to say they don't mean much because they have my team close to the bottom and I'm a top 5 team in the East.
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Dec 22, 2007 17:42:12 GMT -5
I don't know how these are determined and how much they really mean, but here they are. I'm going to say they don't mean much because they have my team close to the bottom and I'm a top 5 team in the East. Yea. Im going to have to agree with you there.
|
|
|
Post by hardballer1 - NYK on Dec 23, 2007 13:02:15 GMT -5
81 hum ain't that bad.
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Dec 23, 2007 14:08:20 GMT -5
ratings mean jack NY, just like stats, the end result is all that matters.
|
|
|
Post by corey - NYK/CHA on Dec 23, 2007 15:36:52 GMT -5
You know that's not true. They might not play an outcome on the game, but everyone's interested in ratings. A bit surprising that the self proclaimed "best team" is mediocre according to these ratings. I guess that's what happens when you only have 3 players, though.
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Dec 23, 2007 17:21:15 GMT -5
You know that's not true. They might not play an outcome on the game, but everyone's interested in ratings. A bit surprising that the self proclaimed "best team" is mediocre according to these ratings. I guess that's what happens when you only have 3 players, though. I don't think I have ever posted in this board that my team was the best. but regardless ratings are ratings it really doesn't bother me, it's Wins and Losses. and an old cliche everyone uses. "It's not how you start, it's how you finish." (I think I got the wording right a little.)
|
|